List of all the previous INITIALS winners, date of game played, winning point total of the game, initials used in the game, when the winner got their first point and number of players in the game. I like pinball, video games, pro wrestling, and a bunch of other cool things. These are some thoughts on collecting, games, and pinball. I go by DefaultGen online. You might find my initials DEF up on machines in the North Carolina area if I'm lucky. Show games you have previously hidden from your profile page. They will appear at the top of your list, in case you wish to edit them. Note that this cannot show games you have hidden on the services themselves.
A Supreme Court decision this morning will serve as a victory for the Washington Redskins' ongoing efforts to protect their team name.
The Court ruled that the federal government may not prohibit trademarks on 'immoral' or 'scandalous' materials, in a case brought by a clothing line known as FUCT. Although the Redskins were not a party to the case, it represents a victory for the team because opponents of the team name have argued that they should lose their trademark protection under the 'immoral or scandalous' laws that have now been ruled unconstitutional.
This is the second recent case in which the Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment defends the free speech of companies that have offensive trademarks.
Losing trademark protection wouldn't have forced the team to change its name, but it would have potentially cost the team money in merchandise sales, which might have been a first step toward Dan Snyder changing his stated determination 'never' to change the name. Now Snyder doesn't have to worry about that.
A Supreme Court decision this morning will serve as a victory for the Washington Redskins' ongoing efforts to protect their team name.
The Court ruled that the federal government may not prohibit trademarks on 'immoral' or 'scandalous' materials, in a case brought by a clothing line known as FUCT. Although the Redskins were not a party to the case, it represents a victory for the team because opponents of the team name have argued that they should lose their trademark protection under the 'immoral or scandalous' laws that have now been ruled unconstitutional.
A Supreme Court decision this morning will serve as a victory for the Washington Redskins' ongoing efforts to protect their team name.
The Court ruled that the federal government may not prohibit trademarks on 'immoral' or 'scandalous' materials, in a case brought by a clothing line known as FUCT. Although the Redskins were not a party to the case, it represents a victory for the team because opponents of the team name have argued that they should lose their trademark protection under the 'immoral or scandalous' laws that have now been ruled unconstitutional.
Game 104: June 24 2016 The Initials Game 6
This is the second recent case in which the Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment defends the free speech of companies that have offensive trademarks.
Game 104: June 24 2016 The Initials Games
Losing trademark protection wouldn't have forced the team to change its name, but it would have potentially cost the team money in merchandise sales, which might have been a first step toward Dan Snyder changing his stated determination 'never' to change the name. Now Snyder doesn't have to worry about that.
